I was first introduced to
Shakespeare by my English teacher Mrs Grocott. This was at Cwmcarn Comprehensive
back in the late 1970s and for “O” level English literature we studied the
Merchant of Venice. I had a difficult relationship with English Literature as a
subject. I enjoyed the plays (we also studied An Inspector Calls by J. B.
Priestly and She Stoops to Conquer by Oliver Goldsmith). But the novels didn’t
do much for me (one was The Pearl by John Steinbeck) and as for the poetry. It
left me cold. So much so that I failed my O level.
But as I’ve said Mrs Grocott
introduced me to Shakespeare and for that I’m grateful.
If you’ve never seen the
Merchant of Venice, what follows contains spoilers.
Compared to some Shakespeare
plays on the face of it the Merchant is an easy one. The story, or should that
be stories, are straightforward. Bassanio, a young Venetian of noble rank, wishes to woo the beautiful and wealthy
heiress Portia of Belmont. But he’s
squandered all his money. So, he asks his friend Antonio – the Merchant of the
title – for a loan. Antonio’s assets are all tidied up in various trading
ships. He’s asset rich and cash poor. Nonetheless he agrees to help Bassanio
and Antonio goes a to a Jewish money lender – Shylock – for a loan.
But the loan comes with a heavy price. If
Antonio defaults Shylock wants from Antonio
an equal pound
Of your fair flesh, to be cut off and taken
In what part of your body pleaseth me.
Antonio agrees
thinking all will be well when his ships come back to port. But they don’t, and
Shylock calls in the loan. Antonio and Shylock go to court for Shylock to have
his penalty clause enforced. Shylock wants his “pound of flesh” which in
reality means Antonio will be killed.
At this point
in the play Shakespeare uses one of his tried and tested plot devices – women disguised
as men. In this instance Portia, who is now Bassanio’s wife, disguises herself
as a lawyer brought in to advise on the law. She concludes that the contract is
valid and yes Shylock is entitled to his
pound of flesh. However, she points out that there is nothing in he contract
about any of Antonio's blood being shed. Therefore, Shylock can only have his
pound of flesh if no blood is spilled in the taking of the pound of flesh.
Bassanio
offers Shylock the money for the loan which Shylock reluctantly agrees to
(having previously refused and insisted on the pound of flesh.) But Portia also
prevents Shylock from doing this, on the ground that he has already refused it
"in the open court". She cites a law under which Shylock, as a Jew
and therefore an "alien", having attempted to take the life of a
citizen, has forfeited his property, half to the government and half to Antonio, leaving his life at the mercy of
the Judge.
Shylock
is bankrupted and the play ends happily ever after with Bassanio and Portia
happily married and Antonio alive. (OK, there’s more to it than this. DO NOT
rely on this blog as an aid to revision.)
For many years the play has come under scrutiny
for antisemitism. Certainly, it can be interpreted that way from the way
Shylock is treated and referred to. And in some productions Shylock has become a
caricature of a Jew. (In Nazi Germany the Merchant of Venice was staged this
way.)
However, Shylock can be portrayed in other
ways. He can be portrayed as a sympathetic character. A Jew who is persecuted
for his faith and is pushed to breaking point by anti-semites because of his
faith.
Early on in the play Shylock is challenged
about why he wants a pound of flesh from Antonio. Shylock says:
“… it will feed my revenge. He hath
disgraced me, and
hindered me half a million;
laughed at my losses,
mocked at my gains, scorned my
nation, thwarted my
bargains, cooled my friends,
heated mine
enemies; and what's his
reason? I am a Jew.”
And this brings me to a production of the Merchant
of Venice by the Roal Shakespeare Company at Stratford on Avon. It was entitled
“The Mercnat of Venice 1936” and the actor and writer Tracy Ann Oberman
appeared as Shylock. It was set in the East End of London in 1936 at the time
of the rise of Oswald Mosely’s fascist Black Shirts.
Shylock was portrayed as a hard businesswoman. But
one who has been pushed to demand his pound of flesh, as revenge for the way Antonio
and his Black Shirt wearing friends had treated him and other Jewish people. (And let’s not forget, was Shylock really
expecting he’d get his revenge? What were the chances of all of Antonio’s
fortunes being lost at sea?)
Even “fair Portia” was portrayed as antisemitic.
Initially, in the way Portia treated Shylock’s daughter Jessica (who had eloped
with the Christian Lorenzo taking some of Shylock’s wealth with her.) Then at
court. (Portia was portrayed as someone like Lady Diana Mitford - wife of
Moseley, and in her own right a fascist and Hitler sympathiser.) In this
production by what might be termed “the establishment” joins forces to even
deny Shylock justice in a court of law. No separation of powers here. (As an aside,
just a few days after seeing this production, the Conservative MP Jacob Rees –
Mogg demanded that courts no longer be separate but should be subject to
Parliament. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/popular-conservatives-rees-mogg-attacks-lady-hale-and-calls-for-neutering-of-supreme-court/5118671.article)
I am writing this not a review of the play
(which was excellent by the way with Ms Oberman on top form.) But because I was
affected by words of Shakespeare said by Shylock.
It is a continuation of the speech I’ve quoted
earlier:
Hath not a Jew eyes? hath not a Jew
hands, organs,
dimensions, senses,
affections, passions? fed with
the same food, hurt with the
same weapons, subject
to the same diseases, healed
by the same means,
warmed and cooled by the same
winter and summer, as
a Christian is? If you prick
us, do we not bleed?
if you tickle us, do we not
laugh? if you poison
us, do we not die? and if you
wrong us, shall we not
revenge? If we are like you in
the rest, we will
resemble you in that. If a Jew
wrong a Christian,
what is his humility? Revenge.
If a Christian
wrong a Jew, what should his
sufferance be by
Christian example? Why,
revenge.
Words reminding us that all
people are the same regardless of their race, their faith, their gender or sexuality.
Whether Israeli or Palestinian.
As a sixteen year old this
was one of the many quotes from the play we had to memorise and regurgitate. It
is one that stuck – though at the time I’m not sure I realised the importance
of it. I do now.
This production will
transfer to the West End on 15th February. If you can go and see it.